Important: Our WhatsApp number is changing from +61 2 7908 3995 to +44 20 3608 8443 due to technical reasons

What Might A Four-Day Work Week Mean For An Organization With HR Operations In The Asia Pacific Region As Opposed To OCED Economies? Assignment Sample

  • Plagiarism & Error Free Assignments By Subject Experts
  • Affordable prices and discounts for students
  • On-time delivery before the expected deadline

No AI Generated Content

62000+ Projects Delivered

500+ Experts

Enjoy Upto 35% off
- +
1 Page
35% Off
AU$ 11.83
Estimated Cost
AU$ 7.69
Securing Higher Grades Costing Your Pocket? Book Your Assignment At The Lowest Price Now!

Introduction : What Might A Four-Day Work Week Mean For An Organization With HR Operations In The Asia Pacific Region As Opposed To OCED Economies?

Get Free Samples Written by our Top-Notch Subject Expert Writers known for providing the Best Assignment Help Services in Australia

The first part of this research examines in depth about how various governments and firms in the Asia-Pacific region handle labour relations, employment legislation, and social responsibility. The OECD investigates a wide range of industries and economies. The data is analysed in the second portion of the investigation. The essay analyses a variety of elements to determine whether or not the worldwide corporation in both industries might successfully implement a four-day workweek, with a focus on the outcomes. This study will going to provides decision-makers and human resources professionals with the background they need to better understand sustainability and devise strategies for implementing a four-day work week in their organisations around the world.

Part 1 Undertake a comprehensive literature review on:

1.1 Work hours and mental health/stress generally

Numerous studies examining the relationship between working hours and mental stress or fitness found significant implications for people's well-being. Extended expressing hours have consistently been linked to higher stress levels, fatigue, and an unbalanced approach to life and work (as cited by Matsushita, Masateru, and Schuhei Yamamura, 2022). This may increase the risk of mental health issues like stress, hopelessness, and burnout. On the other hand, shorter workweeks and improved work-life balance have demonstrated significant benefits for mental health, including decreased stress, increased job satisfaction, and enhanced general well-being (Lee et al., 2023, P. 12). Agencies are increasingly looking into interventions such as the implementation of a four-day workweek, to boost workers' intellectual health and reduce stress-related issues after realizing the negative effects of long work hours and the benefits of shorter workweeks.

Long working hours are regularly linked to increased stress levels and a higher risk of mental health issues. People who work extremely long hours frequently experience higher levels of stress due to factors such as increased workload, time constraints, and a lack of idle time (Cahill et al., 2020, p. 532). Long-term exposure to work-related pressures without adequate time for recovery can cause long-term stress, which may also contribute to the progression of mental health conditions, including anxiety and disappointment.

Long work hours can also harm the balance between work and life, essential for general well-being. People who struggle to maintain a healthy balance between their personal and professional lives may experience emotions of pressure, lack of sleep, and decreased happiness in their relationships with others and at work (Díaz-Silveira et al., 2020). Additionally, this imbalance might heighten pressure levels and increase the possibility of burnout.

On the other hand, reduced work hours and better work-life balance have produced excellent effects on intellectual health. According to studies, reducing work hours and making room for more personal time and recreation can enhance mood, lower stress levels, and speed up the creative process, as cited by Tam et al. (2021, p.49). Additionally, it gives people more possibilities for taking care of themselves, resting, and enjoying activities that support well-being, which may have a safeguarding impact on mental health issues.

Offering flexible work schedules, such as reduced workweeks or remote work options, can also positively impact the outcomes of intellectual fitness. Stress can be reduced, and general well-being can be improved by giving employees authority over their schedules at work and the flexibility to combine work and private responsibilities.

The relationship between work hours and mental health or pressure is generally complex, with excessive work hours being a significant risk factor for increased stress and potential mental health issues. According to Christopher et al. 2016 recognizing the value of work-life balance and enforcing policies to promote flexible work schedules and fewer work hours can be crucial to maintaining employees' mental health and reducing stress-related issues in the executive department (p. 23).

1.2 Four-day workweek trials, interventions, and Outcomes/results

Businesses throughout the industry have conducted tests and initiatives to determine the potential benefits and outcomes of implementing a four-day workweek. In these tests, the standard forty-hour workweek is usually reduced to four days while maintaining the same pay level. Innovations can include flexible schedule options, process optimization, or advanced work-life balance projects (Prentice, 2019). The results of such experiments have demonstrated positive outcomes. Employees report more job satisfaction, expanded work-life balance, and decreased stress and burnout. In contradiction to concerns about decreased productivity, numerous studies have shown essentially no modification or even increases in cultivation in terms of creativity.

The 4-day work week has also demonstrated excellent effects on recruiting and retaining employees, resulting in lower turnover and associated costs (Husabo, 2021, p. 9). These results show the potential benefits of imposing a 4-day workweek in organizations, including improved employee well-being and overall performance.

1.3 Work hours and mental health/stress in selected Asia Pacific countries

The relationship between work hours and mental health differs across various industries in some Asia-Pacific countries. For instance, long work hours are common in Japan's industrial sector, contributing to increased mental health problems like stress, anxiety, and depression (Hsiao, Victor, et al. 2019). High levels of stress are a result of the industry's harmful character as well as an aspect of life that rewards stubbornness. Similarly, in Japan's healthcare industry, long hours and high workloads can lead to burnout, emotional fatigue, and increased stress levels among healthcare professionals.

Although workdays in Australia's production industry tend to be relatively brief, long workdays can still harm stress levels and mental health. According to a study by Isahak, 2017, p. 324, people working long hours in the manufacturing industry may also experience higher stress levels and less job satisfaction. Long-term stress levels among employees are a result of factors including unpredictable schedules and heavy workload requirements. Excessive working hours, unpredictable shifts, and high-stress conditions can all contribute to tiredness, burnout, and increased stress among healthcare professionals in Australia's medical industry.

It is important to remember that while these observations provide a general knowledge of the relationship between hours spent at work and cognitive fitness/pressure in the selected countries and industries, they may fall short of fully capturing its complexity (Bezak et al., 2022). The impact of work hours on mental wellness and pressure phases in particular areas and sectors is further influenced by personal characteristics, workplace regulations, and societal standards of the country. 

1.4 The Industrial Relations Practices, Employment Regulation, and Social Responsibility in the Selected Asia Pacific Countries

Corporate family practices, employment regulations, and social responsibility impact workplace atmosphere and employee well-being within the chosen Asia-Pacific countries. Corporate close associates in Japan strongly emphasize lifelong employment and organizational loyalty (Yang, 2020, p. 23). Negotiating difficult circumstances at work may involve a collective bargaining strategy involving labor unions and corporate entities. However, there is a need for equivalent advancement in work-life balance practices and tackling excessive working hours.

However, Australia has a distinct approach to labor relations focuses on flexibility and individual labor agreements. The real-world employment legislation provides a framework for essential job requirements, including pay, working hours, and leave entitlements (Yakovleva & Natalia, 2017). Additionally, Australia places a high priority on workplace safety and health regulations. It encourages a balance between work and personal life through initiatives like flexible work schedules and paid sick leave.

Each nation acknowledges the value of corporate social responsibility (CSR) regarding social responsibility. As part of their CSR initiatives, eastern firms prioritize employee welfare and social responsibility (Joseph, Corina, and Roshima, 2020, p. 19). Australia's CSR practices include community participation, ethical business conduct, and sustainable development.

Even though corporate close associates’ practices, employment law, and social responsibility differ between Japan and Australia frequently, both nations are committed to ensuring ethical business practices, tackling the welfare of staff members, and promoting socially responsible business practices. Ongoing efforts are required to improve work-life balance, address long work hours, and build equitable and environmentally friendly workplaces globally.

1.5. Work hours and mental health/stress in selected OCED economies

The association between work hours and mental health/stress differs across certain industries in a few OECD economies. Considering two nations and industries will help with the evaluation.

Working hours and their impact on mental health and stress levels have been major issues in Japan. Long work hours, or "Karoshi," are a well-known way of life in the US linked to detrimental impacts on intellectual health. Employees typically work long hours in industries like banking and manufacturing, which can result in high-stress levels, burnout, or even serious health consequences (McDaid et al., 2017). Attempts that promote work while maintaining a healthy lifestyle and setting time limits were created to address this issue, but it is still difficult to change a deeply established rendering work-related culture and practices.

Working hours and their effects on mental performance and stress levels have also drawn attention in Australia. Although the United States of America often has a greater balance between work and personal life than in Japan, productive industries like finance and healthcare may still require stressful work hours (as cited by Saint-Martin, Anne, Hande Inanc, and Christopher Prinz, 2018). Long hours and stressful working conditions can improve stress levels among personnel in the banking sector. Healthcare workers frequently have to work long shifts and have demanding schedules within the healthcare region, which causes problems with capacity and mental fitness. Work-life harmony, flexible work arrangements, and mental health support programs have all been promoted; however, continual focus is required on dealing with job-related stress and its impact on employees' well-being.

Understanding how long working hours affect stress levels, mental health, and other aspects of both personal and professional life is vital. The stages can differ within nations and industries, depending on various criteria such as workplace practices, business rules and regulations, and individual research (Datta & Debraj, 2023). These observations give a general understanding of the connection between working hours and mental health in Australia and Japan, but they may not capture the whole scope of the issue.

1.6. The industrial relations practices, employment regulations, and social responsibility in the selected OCED economies

Professional household practices in Japan have been distinguished by a strong emphasis on lifelong employment and a system of collective bargaining involving labor unions and employer groups. The labor market is governed by various legislative rules and regulations protecting employees' rights, such as minimum wage requirements, working hours, and safeguarding rules. However, there were continuous debates about the need for additional improvements to enhance the balance between work and personal life, address excessive work hours, and provide job stability for non-typical workers.

Corporate participants in family practices prioritize individual work agreements and adaptability in Australia (Bank, Dénes, 2017, p. 38). The realistic working Act provides a framework for essential working conditions, which comprises pay, working hours, and holiday benefits. The nation has a system of grants that establish employment standards specific to industries and established collective bargaining agreements.

In Japan, continuous employment is typically central to family-owned company processes. This practice displays a history of commitment between businesses and employees and promotes employment security and stability. The USA has a collective bargaining mechanism where employer groups and trade unions bargain working conditions, pay, and benefits (Ibsen, Christian Lyhne, and Maite Tapia, 2017, p. 181). There have been interactions, however, regarding the need for measures to address issues like excessive working hours, improve work-life stability, and offer greater certainty of employment for non-typical workers. More adaptability in the workplace is being promoted, and attempts are being made to hire more inclusive and varied staff.

Japan's employment laws and regulations protect the rights of workers. These regulations cover minimum compensation, working hours, reimbursement for overtime, and health and safety regulations. The Labor-intensive Standards Act establishes several employment-related rules, including the maximum Working hours, rest periods, and yearly leave benefits. There are continuing efforts to review and modify those rules to match the ever-changing dynamics of work better and encourage a healthier work-life balance.

Eastern businesses frequently prioritize employee well-being and work safeguarding while implementing corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs. Many businesses have policies and programs to encourage employee well-being, including support for balance between work and life, wellness and health initiatives, and opportunities for professional growth and training (Popkova et al., 2021). Apart from that, there is a growing focus on inclusion and diversity at work, with initiatives to promote gender equality and strengthen the visibility of women.

Corporate companions in Australia recognize flexibility and individual job contracts. The USA has a system of awards establishing sector-specific employment standards, including minimum salaries, overtime pay, and leave allowances. The equitable labor legislation outlines the basic requirements for job opportunities and safeguards employees' rights, including those against discrimination and unlawful termination of employment. Collective bargaining agreements between companies and trade unions also govern working conditions.

Australia highly values social responsibility, and organizations support corporate social responsibility initiatives. CSR initiatives cover various topics, including charity, networking participation, corporate ethical practices, and the sustainability of the environment. Australian businesses frequently participate in initiatives that benefit local communities, promote social causes, and improve organizations' sustainability (Sydow et al., 2021). Regarding the security and safeguarding of employees, there is also an emphasis on workplace well-being standards.

Hence, both Japan and Australia prioritize safeguarding workers' liberties and are committed to encouraging equitable conditions at work, considering differences in corporate family practice and employment laws between the two countries. Furthermore, social responsibility is a major factor for organizations in every country, with programs that promote employee well-being, inclusion, equality, diversity, and sustainability (Grimshaw, Damian, 2020, p. 498). Ongoing conversations and projects are focused on promoting sustainable and inclusive workplaces, improving work-life balance, and adapting to ever-shifting workforce fluctuations.

Part 2: Analyse and report on your findings in terms of:

2.1. The feasibility of a four-day work week for a global organization operating in the selected Asia Pacific countries

Considering a global company with operations in Japan and Australia, the economic feasibility of introducing a four-day workweek depends on several variables and may require careful analysis. Here are some criteria for determining its viability:

Cultural and working environment: Japan and Australia have fantastic work cultures and regulations. Cultural and working environment. Long working days and commitment to the task were once considered important in Japan, while work-life balance is more valued in Australia. Enforcement of a 4-day working week might also necessitate a cultural change in Japan's attitudes toward working hours (Chakraborty et al., 2022, p. 289). The shift might be easier in Australia, where stress is more heavily on maintaining a healthy work-life balance.

Legal and regulatory context: Australia and Japan have different legal and regulatory frameworks governing working hours and contractual agreements for employment. Organizations may want to comply with local labor laws and ensure that adopting a 4-day workweek complies with the laws in each of the collective's member states. The bargaining agreement may impact the suitability and navigating process, if relevant.

Regional and business concerns: The economic viability of a 4-day work week can also differ across various companies and sectors. A few sectors, like healthcare and manufacturing, may experience technical challenges with minimizing work hours without sacrificing essential amenities or productivity (Beno et al., 2022). But industries with more flexible working schedules, comprising technology or specialized services, may also find it easier to implement a shortened working strategy.

Worker productivity and task management: It's crucial to determine how a four-day workweek affects staff output and workload allocation. To make sure that the workload is properly managed during the shorter workdays, good planning, project prioritization, and effective workflow administration may be essential (as cited by Lonez, Leudane, and Nicette, 2018). The strategy involves rethinking task roles, shifting responsibilities, and promoting effective time management techniques.

Employee engagement and well-being: Paying close attention to these factors is essential. While a shortened workweek may help with work-life balance and reduce burnout, it's important to determine how it will affect employee stress levels, job satisfaction, and general well-being. Regular feedback, open communication, and employee participation in decision-making may help determine sustainability and satisfy concerns.

Implementing a 4-day working week for a multinational company operating in Japan and Australia requires a careful assessment of cultural, institutional, regional, and worker-related variables (Douglas-Jones, Rachel, 2017, p. 22). Each US of America's specific context should be considered, together with an understanding of the organization's particular goals, techniques, and professional dynamic range.

Verifying sustainability and ensuring an effective execution can be done by launching the idea, analyzing results, and introducing modifications entirely based on feedback.

2.2. The feasibility of a four-day work week for a global organization operating in the selected OCED economies

Several factors must be carefully considered to determine whether implementing a four-day work week for an international organization operating in Japan and Australia; both OECD economies is feasible.

Following are some circumstances to keep in mind about:

Japan and Australia have amazing working cultures and norms, as do the rest of the world. The conventional working ethic in Japan usually emphasizes long hours and dedication to the job. Applying a 4-day working week might also call for a cultural transformation and a change in how people view working hours (as cited by King, Lewis, Jeroen, and Van Den Bergh, 2017, p. 129). The shift may be easier in Australia, where work-life balance is more strongly emphasized but still relies on the specific organizational and business culture.

  • Operational requirements: Following the operational demands of the business, a 4-day work week may or may not be feasible. Certainly, companies and business sectors, including those in healthcare, manufacturing, or customer service, may encounter challenges in providing ongoing support or satisfying client needs with shortened work weeks. Evaluating the operational impact and developing solutions to any capacity-related problems is crucial.

  • Legal and regulatory environment: Both nations have clear labor laws and regulations governing working hours and employment agreements. When establishing a four-day work week, enterprises should ensure compliance with local laws and consider any unlawful restrictions or requirements. If appropriate, agreements on collective bargaining may also impact the approach and viability of negotiations.

  • Worker productiveness and workload control: Maintaining high productivity levels can be aided by implementing efficient workflows, utilizing technology, and promoting effective time management techniques.

  • Employee well-being and engagement: Evaluating the influence on worker satisfaction and engagement is critical. Even if shorter work hours may improve work-life balance and minimize burnout, it's crucial to keep an eye on the impact on employee stress levels, job satisfaction, and general well-being. To ensure prosperous changing circumstances, groups must constantly connect with employees, collect feedback, and offer assistance.
  • Flexibility and adaptability: Flexibility and adaptation are essential components for the long-term success of a four-day working week. Businesses should remember that enforcing experimental programs or progressive changes allows them to evaluate the results and make necessary adjustments, according to Grosse and Robert, 2018. The fulfillment depends on the customized strategy to fit the specific needs and circumstances of the organization, groups, and individuals.

Hence, a four-day workweek's sustainability over the long term depends on flexibility and adaptability. Organizations should remember that implementing progressive modifications or experimental programs enables them to measure the outcomes and make necessary modifications along the way. The approach must be modified to meet the unique requirements and conditions specific to the organization, groups, and individuals to succeed.

2.3 Recommended global strategies that the global organization could consider

Following are some global strategies that a multinational corporation may want to consider while enforcing a four-day workweek:

Pilot programs: To test the viability and effectiveness of a 4-day work week, start with trial programs in certain departments or teams. Collect feedback and data from people to determine the impact on output, employee happiness, and work-life balance. Before scaling the implementation strategy across the company, this knowledge can be used to improve it.

Work Arrangements: Learn about alternative working schedules outside the standard four-day working week. These might incorporate choices like remote work, Flexible working hours, reduced workweeks, or workflow-sharing producers. Enhancing the work-life balance and increasing employee satisfaction can be accomplished by customizing the work schedule to consider every staff member's preference and organizational needs.

Clean communique and change management: Clear verbal interchange is necessary when enforcing a significant change, such as a four-day workweek, to ensure that employees know the benefits and any corresponding modifications regarding their roles or responsibilities. Give supervisors the information and support they require to effectively supervise teams under the new working conditions and deal with any problems or challenges that may arise.

Generation and workflow optimization: Utilise technological innovations tools and solutions to optimize generation and workflows to improve teamwork. It includes online applications for environmental interaction, task management, and information exchange so that Staff can be as effective as possible throughout the fewer hours of the workday.

Performances Measurement and Assessment: To ensure accountability and evaluate the impact of the 4-day workweek, develop specific performance measurements and assessment procedures. Continue highlighting significant productivity indicators, customer satisfaction, employee involvement, and well-being. Depending on data-driven insights, modify policies and strategies to improve the effectiveness of the programs.

Go-cultural issues: Consider the cultural diversity and customs in various operating regions and nations. While maintaining a consistent approach to worldwide operations, modify the implementation strategy to address local work cultures, labor regulations, and expectations of staff members.

Worker improvement and well-being: Prioritize employee mental health by providing resources and assistance for managing work-life balance, minimizing stress, and cognitive well-being. Provide staff with training opportunities and educational programs to enhance their skills and talents, enabling them to work fewer hours and be more productive and profitable.

Participant involvement: During the method's implementation, it engages with stakeholders, including workers, organizations (if applicable), and various associated events. To ensure the success of the 4-day working week implementation, include them in decision-making, deal with problems, and promote a collaborative work environment.

To achieve an effortless change to a 4-day work week, it is crucial to customize the strategy and consider the global organization's and its employees' specific desires.

Following are some further recommendations for a company having human resources activities in the Asia Pacific region:

Cultural sensitivity: Be mindful of the Asia-Pacific region's diverse cultures and professional expectations. Recognize that opinions on working hours and balancing a career with a personal life may differ between cultures. Adapt the implementation strategy and communication methods to the local cultural norms and values.

Flexibility in job scheduling: Be aware that a universal approach will not work across many worldwide locations in the Asia Pacific. The four-day workweek concept should be modified to fit the unique needs and pReferences of each US, taking into consideration local labor laws, business requirements, and employee expectations.

Education and training: To help managers and staff customize to the unfamiliar job environment, offer comprehensive educational and training programs. To ensure an effortless shift and make the most of a four-day workweek, give advice on time management, productivity enhancement, and effective communication.

Collaboration and communique equipment: Invest in interpersonal and teamwork solutions that enable seamless communication and collaboration amongst geographically separated groups. That is especially important for organizations with human resources operations spread across several countries within the Asia Pacific region. Virtual gathering places, project management methods, and knowledge-sharing platforms can improve productivity and a sense of belongingness.

Workload distribution and useful resource control: Division of the workload and supervision of the available resources is crucial for preventing burnout and maintaining productivity levels. Examine the level of personnel, qualifications, and workload management capabilities to manage the workload during the reduced work hours effectively.

Employee engagement and popularity: Looking at increasing more staff or transferring responsibilities as desired.To maintain enthusiasm and efficiency, cultivate an atmosphere of staff participation and satisfaction. Implement employee feedback systems, recognition programs, and opportunities for career advancement to boost employee satisfaction and commitment.

Continual evaluation and improvement: Track employee input while comparing the impact of a four-day workweek. Examine key performance indicators, employee satisfaction scores, and any problems or difficulties that may occur. Utilize this feedback to improve the implementation strategy over time.

Benchmarking and pleasant practices: Competitiveness and pleasant practices keep up with industry trends and best practices for implementing a four-day workweek. To gather knowledge and analyze from their assessments, associations in the OECD and the Asia-Pacific region have been measured against one another; performance reports and best practices are shared around the company's global network to encourage information sharing and ensure continual growth.

Considering the successful completion of a 4-day working Week in the Asia Pacific region necessitates a comprehensive approach that takes into consideration the specific cultural, governmental, and operational aspects of each US of America; by paying attention to these recommendations, groups may increase the likelihood that their shift will be successful and maximize the benefits of a shorter workweek.


  • Bank, Dénes. "Double dependent market economy and corporate social responsibility in Hungary." Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 8, no. 1 (2017): 25-47.


  • Beno, Michal, Jozef Hvorecky, and Stepanka Jenesova. "On-site workforce shortening the week in favour of flexibility." Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR) 9, no. 6 (2022): 1034-1045.


  • Bezak, Eva, Kristin V. Carson-Chahhoud, Loredana G. Marcu, Magdalena Stoeva, Lenka Lhotska, Gilda A. Barabino, Fatimah Ibrahim, et al. "The biggest challenges resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic on gender-related work from home in biomedical fields—World-wide qualitative survey analysis." International Journal of environmental research and public health 19, no. 5 (2022): 3109.


  • Cahill, Joan, Paul Cullen, and Keith Gaynor. "Interventions to support the management of work-related stress (WRS) and wellbeing/mental health issues for commercial pilots." Cognition, Technology & Work 22 (2020): 517-547.


  • Chakraborty, Debarun, Shakti Bodh Bhatnagar, Wendrila Biswas, and Ganesh Dash. "The Subtle Art of Effecting a Four-day Workweek to Drive Performance." Management and Labour Studies 47, no. 3 (2022): 275-297.


  • Christopher, Michael S., Richard J. Goerling, Brant S. Rogers, Matthew Hunsinger, Greg Baron, Aaron L. Bergman, and David T. Zava. "A pilot study evaluating the effectiveness of a mindfulness-based intervention on cortisol awakening response and health outcomes among law enforcement officers." Journal of Police and criminal psychology 31 (2016): 15-28.


  • Datta, Debraj. "Mental Health and Economic Downturn: Are Post-Pandemic HR Roles and Responsibilities Changing?" Human Resource Management in a Post-Epidemic Global Environment: Roles, Strategies, and Implementation (2023).


  • Díaz-Silveira, Cintia, Carlos-María Alcover, Francisco Burgos, Alberto Marcos, and Miguel A. Santed. "Mindfulness versus physical exercise: Effects of two recovery strategies on mental health, stress, and immunoglobulin A during lunch breaks. A randomized controlled trial." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, 8 (2020): 2839.


  • Douglas-Jones, Rachel. "Making room for ethics: Spaces, surveys and standards in the Asia-Pacific region." Science & Technology Studies 30, no. 3 (2017): 13-34.


  • Gibson, Adam. Agile Workforce Planning: How to Align People with Organizational Strategy for Improved Performance. Kogan Page Publishers, 2021.


  • Grimshaw, Damian. "International organisations and the future of work: How new technologies and inequality shaped the narratives in 2019." Journal of Industrial Relations 62, no. 3 (2020): 477-507.


  • Grosse, Robert. The four-day workweek. Routledge, 2018.


  • Hsiao, Victor, Nicole Stoltzfus, and Mellissa Withers. (2019). "An assessment of workplace wellness policies and programs of universities in the Asia-Pacific." Work Preprint: 1-11.


  • Husabo, Elisabeth, Bente SM Haugland, Bryce D. McLeod, Valborg Baste, Åshild Tellefsen Haaland, Jon Fauskanger Bjaastad, Asle Hoffart, et al. "Treatment fidelity in brief versus standard-length school-based interventions for youth with anxiety." School Mental Health (2021): 1-14.


  • Ibsen, Christian Lyhne, and Maite Tapia. "Trade union revitalisation: Where are we now? Where to next?" Journal of Industrial Relations 59, no. 2 (2017): 170-191.


  • Isahak, Marzuki, May Young Loh, Indri Hapsari Susilowati, Orawan Kaewboonchoo, Kitiphong Harncharoen, Nursuhaili Mohd Amin, Nguyen Phuong Toai, Wah-Yun Low, and Paul Ratanasiripong. "The association of workplace exposures on quality of life in small and medium enterprises workers: a cross-sectional study in four ASEAN countries." Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health 29, no. 4 (2017): 315-327.


  • Joseph, Corina, and Roshima Said. "The Evolution of Institutional Environments in the Development of Corporate Social Responsibility in Selected ASEAN Countries." The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility (2020): 1-23.


  • King, Lewis C., and Jeroen CJM Van Den Bergh. "Worktime reduction as a solution to climate change: five scenarios compared for the UK." Ecological Economics 132 (2017): 124-134.


  • Lee, Fallyn M., Julie M. Koch, and Nikita Ramakrishnan. "Fine Arts Students: Mental Health, Stress, and Time on Academic Work." Journal of college student psychotherapy (2023): 1-16.


  • Lonez, Leudane L., and Nicette N. Ganal. "An Evaluation of Four-Day Compressed Workweek of Ifugao State University System: Basis for Action Plan." EDUCARE 11, no. 1 (2018).


  • Matsushita, Masateru, and Schuhei Yamamura. "The relationship Between long working hours and stress responses in junior high school teachers: A Nationwide survey in Japan." Frontiers in Psychology 12 (2022): 775522.


  • McDaid, David, Emily Hewlett, and A-La Park. "Understanding effective approaches to promoting mental health and preventing mental illness." (2017).


  • Popkova, Elena, Piper DeLo, and Bruno S. Sergi. "Corporate social responsibility amid social distancing during the COVID-19 crisis: BRICS vs. OECD countries." Research in International Business and Finance 55 (2021): 101315.


  • Prentice, Ross L., Aaron K. Aragaki, Barbara V. Howard, Rowan T. Chlebowski, Cynthia A. Thomson, Linda Van Horn, Lesley F. Tinker et al. "Low-fat dietary pattern among postmenopausal women influences long-term cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes outcomes." The Journal of Nutrition 149, no. 9 (2019): 1565-1574.


  • Saint-Martin, Anne, Hande Inanc, and Christopher Prinz. "Job quality, health and productivity: an evidence-based framework for analysis." (2018).


  • Sydow, Jörg, Elke Schüßler, and Markus Helfen. "Managing global production networks: Towards social responsibility via inter-organizational reliability?" In The Relational View of Economics: A New Research Agenda for the Study of Relational Transactions, pp. 133-158. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022.


  • Tam, Kimberly, Rory Hopcraft, Tom Crichton, and Kevin Jones. "The potential mental health effects of remote control in an autonomous maritime world." Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping 5, no. 2 (2021): 40-55.


  • Yakovleva, Natalia. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industries. Routledge, 2017.


  • Yang, Na, Jue Wang, Xiaming Liu, and Lingyun Huang. "Home-country institutions and corporate social responsibility of emerging economy multinational enterprises: The Belt and Road initiative as an example." Asia Pacific Journal of Management (2020): 1-39.


Recently Download Samples by Customers
Get best price for your work

offer valid for limited time only*

© Copyright 2024 | New Assignment Help | All rights reserved